Supreme Court Upholds Ohio Voter Purge Law

A five-justice majority of the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Ohio’s voter purge system, finding the process by which the state removes inactive voters from the rolls does not violate federal law.

The Daily Signal writes:

Although critics of Ohio’s practice charge the state’s true purpose is the removal of left-leaning voters from the registry, the high court found the process is consistent with federal law.

“Today’s decision is a victory for election integrity, and a defeat for those who use the federal court system to make election law across the country,” Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted said. “This decision is validation of Ohio’s efforts to clean up the voter rolls and now with the blessing nation’s highest court, it can serve as a model for other states to use.”

Justice Samuel Alito wrote the Court’s opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch. Justice Stephen Breyer led the liberal bloc in dissent, joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

Ohio’s maintenance process is fairly straightforward. Voters who do not cast a ballot during a full federal election cycle (which runs two years) are sent a mailer confirming they are still residents of Ohio who wish to remain registered voters. If the mailer is not returned, and if the individual does not vote for the next four years, they are removed from state rolls.

The 1993 National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) requires all states to adopt policies providing for the removal of ineligible voters from state rolls. In his opinion for the Court, Alito claimed 24 million voter registrations are currently “invalid or significantly inaccurate,” according to a 2012 study from the Pew Center on the States. However, the NVRA forbids removal “by reason of the person’s failure to vote.”

Civil rights and good government groups challenged the Ohio procedure, arguing it targets and prunes voters on the basis of their inactivity. Nonvoting, the challengers point out, is used twice by the state’s process: once as the trigger for the mailer, and again as a condition for final removal. But Alito explained that the NVRA only prohibits the use of nonvoting as the sole cause for deregistration.

For more details, read the rest of the story at The Daily Signal.

In the news:

1 day, 2 hours ago

Supreme Court: States Can Collect Online Sales Tax

The Supreme Court opened the door for states to collect sales taxes on purchases from online retailers even if that company doesn't have a physical presence in that state.

1 day, 5 hours ago

Michigan Dem Gov Candidate Gretchen Whitmer’s Allies Face Questions Over Alleged Campaign Finance Violation

With recent polls showing Gretchen Whitmer trailing in the Michigan Democrat gubernatorial primary, her allies are now facing questions over whether their television ads are in violation of state campaign finance laws.

2 days, 1 hour ago

Under GOP Governor Kay Ivey, Alabama Jobs and Wages Reach 11-Year High

Republican Governor Kay Ivey’s pro-growth leadership is delivering results for the people of Alabama.

2 days, 2 hours ago

WATCH Nikki Haley Announce Withdrawal From UN Human Rights Council

The U.S. will withdraw from the United Nations Human Rights Council, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley announced Tuesday.

2 days, 3 hours ago

Wisconsin Dem Gov Primary Gets Ugly As Candidates Fight To Prove Who Is The Most Far-Left

Wisconsin’s Democrat gubernatorial primary is getting ugly fast as candidates fight it out to prove who is the most extreme, far-left choice for voters this November.

2 days, 5 hours ago

Tax Hiker Molly Kelly Commits To Rolling Back Tax Cuts In New Hampshire

New Hampshire Democrat gubernatorial candidate Molly Kelly is making it clear to voters that she wants to increase their tax burden if elected.